PART I - WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
Over the course of the last 2 years, we have
published weekly literature reviews on the latest research in biomechanics,
injury risk, movement assessment and performance enhancement. As a company, we want to educate parents,
providers, coaches and athletes about how to use this information to prevent
injuries and improve athletic performance.
As interesting and thought provoking as much of this research is, sadly
it rehashes a lot of the same research that was done over 10 years ago. The results are often identical to what
previous studies showed us with little new knowledge gained. So why the rehash?
Simply
put is that the problem remains. According
to Dodwell
et al, we are seeing even greater increases in injury rates among our
younger athletes. Dodwell’s study showed
there has been a 189% increase in ACL injuries (17.6/100,000 vs. 50.9/100,000)
in those 3 years of age to 20 years of age over the last 20 years. For 17 year olds, there has been a 900%
increase in ACL injuries (17.6/100,000 to 176.7/100,000). So, if we know what the causative factors are
and have for over 10 years, why are we still seeing these dramatic
increases? Again, simply put, we have
failed to use the last 10 years of research to create standardized protocols to
assess risk factor.
F or example, we know from work by Powers, Hewett,
Myer’s and multiple others that there are certain movement patterns that are
associated with risk. In the May 2013
issue of the Journal of Strength and Conditioning, Atkins et al
showed that lateral displacement of the pelvis during the squatting motion
results in alterations in the way that ground reaction forces are attenuated
through the lower kinetic chain. This
alteration changes force distribution during loading (a factor which increases
risk) and results in suboptimal force production (decreased athletic
performance). In other words, the
movement captured here in this high school soccer player shows a significant
lateral shift (lateral displacement of the pelvis) leads to decreased
performance and increased injury risk.
Not only does this result in altered force production and distribution,
but also results in significant imbalances in quadriceps/hamstring strength and
endurance between the right and left. If
this is the case and we know this, why do we not quantify this in a
standardized assessment?
In March 2014 in the American Journal of
Sports Medicine, Stearns
et al showed that adduction in the frontal plane is directly correlated
to adduction moment. This adduction
moment is directly correlated to forces distributed to the knee and hence
injury risk! If there are increases in
the magnitude of adduction in the frontal plane then you increase the adduction
moment and stress to the ACL as well as other tissues. Along with that, you also alter the load
distribution of all the weight bearing structures of the entire lower kinetic
chain including the ankle, hip and low back.
In other words, the movement captured here in an NFL player not only puts
him at risk for injury of the knee but also the ankle, hip and low back. Along with that, as adduction moment
increases, there is also a negative impact on kinetic energy transfer and
decreased efficiency throughout the system which leads to decreased athletic performance. If this is the case and we know this, why do
we not quantify this in a standardized assessment?
In January 2013 issue of the American Journal
of Sports Medicine, Hewett
et al showed that limb asymmetry in movement was strongly correlated to
multiplanar movement which is associated with risk. We also know that those who return to sport
are at a very high risk of re-injury.
Therefore, assessing movement in single limb performance and comparing
that to the contralateral limb is critical for not only determining risk but
also for making return to sport calls.
In other words, the movement captured here in a MLS player, when
compared to the non-operative side shows a significant imbalance in
movement. If this is the case and we
know this, why do we not quantify this in a standardized assessment?
Realizing these are rhetorical questions, the
answer is simple. We have possessed the
knowledge but not a way to do this in a reliable fashion that is
efficient. Until recent advancements in
technology, there has not been a way, or more accurately, an affordable technology
we could use to do this in an efficient and reliable fashion. However, that is about to change! A.C.L.,LLC and Microsoft are advancing the
science and technology of injury prevention and performance enhancement! Completely outside the box and to an entirely
new level! Not that we want to make our
blog an infomercial for a product we have created, but we do want to continue
to educate people about injury prevention and performance enhancement. As such, we feel it is important to educate
people on what advancements are being made in this area. With that, what is about to be released, we
believe, will revolutionize the way we look at and assess lower kinetic chain
dysfunction in athletes! To meet our
mission of profoundly reducing athletic injuries, then what we do must be
completely outside the box! Evolving
with the research and evolving with technology is how innovation in injury
prevention and performance enhancement occurs!
Stay tuned for next week for Part II – Taking Gaming
Technology To A New Level!
Build
Athletes to Perform…Build Athletes to Last!™
About
the author: Trent Nessler, PT, DPT, MPT is
CEO of A.C.L., LLC and is a practicing physical therapist with 15 years in
sports medicine and orthopedics. He has masters in physical therapy and
doctorate with focus in biomechanics and motor learning. He is the
founder/developer of the Dynamic
Movement Assessment™, Fatigue Dynamic Movement Assessment™, 3D-DMA™ and author of a textbook “Dynamic
Movement Assessment™: Prevent Injury and Enhance Performance”. Trent is
also associate editor of the International Journal of Athletic Therapy and
Training and Member of the USA Cheer Safety Council. For more information, please see our website
at www.aclprogram.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment