Gradients of Gluteus
Medius Weakness – Part III
In our last couple
of blogs, we have talked about the function of the gluteus medius in both an
open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain.
We have also talked about how this muscle functions on both the femur
and the hip and how weakness of this muscle will present itself at the femur
versus at the hip. Although most
understand the movement that occurs at the femur, identifying weakness that is
represented at the hip is just as critical as it is at the femur. With the shear stresses that are imparted to
the labrum of the hip during these motions, hip motion can have just as
devastating effect on the hip as the movement can have on the ACL at the
knee.
So now that we have
identified it, how do we strengthen it?
Easiest thing is to look at the function of the muscle. Before we get into specific exercises, let’s
say one obvious thing, if you are going to strengthen this muscle, do it
right! Every single day, we see physical
therapists, athletic trainers and personal trainers who do these exercises
wrong and just strengthen bad or compensatory movement patterns. In these cases, it is better to not do it
than to do it. Because strengthening bad
movement patterns sets them up for greater risk. To increase recruitment or maximal volitional
contraction (MVC) of the gluteus medius, we need to think of it not just as strengthening
the muscle. You have to change
recruitment patterns and sequence of firing.
Yes strength is a part of that but only a part. To change MVC during functional movement you
must change motor plans in the primary motor cortex.
In 1998, Karni et al showed that
in order to change a motor plan in the primary motor cortex (PMC), it required
3,000 to 30,000 repetitions. The authors
also showed that you can employ techniques which result in quicker change and
that there are also things that we do that will result in slower changes. From this, we have developed a saying.
Poor Technique = Poor Motor Learning =
Poor Performance
Learn it, live it
and teach it. Change in the PMC is
critical to change how the muscle fires during movement. Based on the science, we know for every
repetition that you do incorrectly, you then must do three reps to have a
positive change on the PMC. Considering
this then, you must do one rep to offset the bad movement, one rep to offset
the previous bad rep and one rep to drive a positive change in the PMC. Sounds simple enough right? Sadly, even with highly educated individuals,
we typically see athletes doing the exercise incorrectly under direct
supervision. We then wonder why their
movement has not improved that even when we are focusing on the right area and
muscles. Identifying the previously
mentioned movements is hard enough when doing it in an assessment let alone
when we are doing exercises. There are
numerous exercises to strengthen the gluteus medius in both an open kinetic
chain and closed kinetic chain.
Therefore, we will only cover two exercises in depth which work on the gluteus
medius in a closed kinetic chain.
One such exercise,
we call the lumbopelvic disassociation (LPD).
You can view a video of this on our YouTube channel, by clicking
here. This exercise is intended
to do several things:
·
Assist athletes in discerning
lumbar motion from hip motion by improving proprioception through the hip
·
Provide a closed
kinetic chain exercise to start strengthening the gluteus medius
The video is
intended to give viewers some pointers.
Although the athlete may do it incorrectly, this video’s intent is to
not only show the exercise but to show where people go wrong. This said, there are some common mistakes
that people make in performing this exercise and which we can look for during
performance of. Once you have viewed the
video, take a look at the athlete in this photo performing the exercise, you
see several key factors.
·
Knee/ankle/foot are
stable
·
Non-stance leg is
extended – this places the lumbar spine in extension and aids athlete in
keeping neutral spine and not going into lumbar flexion during.
·
Chest is up –
promotes thoracic extension which also promoted lumber extension
·
Hips are level
If you compare the
above athlete to the athlete pictured in the next photo, you can see some
slight variations that also lead to strengthening compensatory strategies. Keep in mind, this athlete is demonstrating
minor deviations and is not even close to the magnitude of deviations that you
would typically see when someone does this incorrectly. We use this example because it is even these
slight changes that result in significant impacts to the MVC of the gluteus
medius. In this case what we see is:
·
Non-stance
leg in extension and chest up – good
·
Neutral spine
position – good
·
Retrotrendelenburg
position of the right hip – indicated with the yellow circle and seen with the
hips not being level and the left hip coming up (placing the right hip in a
retrotrendelenburg position)
·
Externally rotated
position of the right foot – indicated with the red circle
The combination of
the raising of the left hip and the external rotation at the right foot makes
the retrotrendelenburg much greater at the right hip. If we allowed him to continue this with all
of his training, we can anticipate that when he performs in single leg stance
or single limb tests, that his natural tendency is going to go into a
retrotrendelenburg on the right when performing single limb tests on the
right. The simple correction is having
him bring his right foot in slightly and drop his left hip down slightly.
What is pictured
above is a retrotrendelenburg but keep in mind that this can also present
itself as a trendelenburg. Easiest way
to see both of these is to simply look at the hip position. Are the hips level during the course of this
exercise? You have to watch closely
during the beginning phases of this exercise as it may present itself here as
the athlete rotating their hips out. If
they do and we allow them to continue that, then we are again just reinforcing
the bad movement patterns and strengthening their compensatory strategies.
Another common
exercise used to strengthen the gluteus medius in a closed kinetic chain is side-stepping
with a theraband. In this video,
we again go through some specific pointers related to the technique and
compensations. Even though this is one
of the most widely used exercises for gluteus medius weakness, it is also one
that is often performed incorrectly a majority of time.
·
Having the band to
high – higher the band is, the easier the exercise is. Placing the band at the ankles not only makes
the exercise more difficult but also brings in higher recruitment along the
lower kinetic chain.
·
Band too loose – if
the band is not tight at the starting position, it will be too easy throughout
the motion and only stress the muscle at its weakest point in the length
tension curve.
·
Lack of core
activation – keeping in mind the concept of specificity, if we train with increase
in lumbar lordosis (lack core activation) throughout this exercise then this
promotes lack of core activation when it matters the most.
·
Allowing
compensation during performance of the exercise. Common compensations are:
o Externally rotating with stepping out – this allows
increased recruitment of the hip flexors and reduces MVC of the gluteus medius
o Standing when bringing feet together – this is a much
easier position for the movement and maintaining this position throughout will
aid in increased MVC.
Taking these few
pointers and applying to your gluteus medius strengthening will not only make a
huge difference in what the athlete feels but also aid in improving their
mechanics with CKC movement. We hope that you found this blog insightful
and useful. As we stated previously,
stay tuned and if you like what you see, SHARE THE PASSION! It is the biggest compliment you can
give. Follow us on Twitter @ACL_prevention and tweet about it. #ACLPlayItSafe and help us spread the passion.
Dr. Nessler is a practicing physical therapist with over 20 years sports medicine clinical experience and a nationally recognized expert in the area of athletic movement assessment. He is the developer of an athletic biomechanical analysis, is an author of a college textbook on this subject and has performed >5000 athletic movement assessments. He serves as the National Director of Sports Medicine Innovation for Select Medical, is Chairman of Medical Services for the International Obstacle Racing Federation and associate editor of the International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training.
No comments:
Post a Comment