Importance of Single
Limb Testing
Over the course of the last several weeks, we have been talking about
how to apply the research to how we assess and treat athletes. Whether we are strength coach, athletic trainer or a physical
therapist, there is a way to take the current knowledge and literature and
apply it in a way that is much more effective than the way we have
traditionally done or do today. For this
discussion we are going to talk about single limb performance.
One of the hottest topics right now in sports
medicine is when do you make a return to sport call. Why? Clinicians
and physicians are becoming more and more cautious because re-injury rates are
high with those who return to sport to early and the outcome on the 2nd
surgery is never as good as the first.
Why is this risk so high? In a
study published by Stearns et al in the
American Journal of Sports Medicine
in 2013, they looked at female soccer players that were cleared to return to
sport following an ACL reconstruction.
What they found was that they still demonstrated increased adduction
angles in the frontal plane which is directly associated with the adduction
moment & risk. The bigger the angle,
the higher the moment which means the higher the risk is for ACL injury. But this is only becomes clear when doing a
comparison to the contralateral limb in a closed kinetic full weight bearing
test (as demonstrated here).
So, when do you know is the right time to
return an athlete to sport following an injury or surgery? Frankly, no one really knows. There is a lot of debate about this issue
because, as of today, we still don’t have a standardized way or protocol that
we use in which can aid us in making that call.
Hence why so many athletes fail to return to their prior level of
performance and why over 20% re-rupture their ACL within the first 2 years of
returning to sport. We know from the
literature that you should be somewhere within 80-85% of your non-involved
limb. But how do we test that. Today, that is mostly done off of subjective
findings, subjective observations and an objective open kinetic chain
computerized test (Kin Com for example).
In this particular test, the subject is seated in a device that looks
like a computerized leg extension machine.
The subject performs both leg extension and flexion under
resistance. At the conclusion the
computer provides a report showing symmetry or asymmetry between the two
extremities.

Take this particular case in point. This 16 year old basketball player who was
previously seen for knee pain and patellofemoral issues was returned to sport
after a thorough examination by both her physical
therapist and physician. Her examination
consisted of a review of her exercise program she was doing in therapy, her
manual muscle testing scores performed on the table, her self reported outcome
and measured range of motion. However,
she was not evaluated in a closed kinetic chain nor was her movement assessed
during functional closed kinetic chain exercises. In this case, upon return to sport, she
demonstrated the following motion on a lateral pivoting motion which resulted
in her rupturing her ACL. Would she have
demonstrated this motion on a functional closed kinetic chain test? It is unknown nor can we speculate one way or
the other. What we do know is if you do
not access closed kinetic chain motion, then you will never know.

Next week, we will continue this discussion on
single limb testing and correlation to injury risk. We hope that you found this
blog insightful and useful. As we stated
previously, stay tuned and if you like what you see, SHARE THE PASSION! It is the biggest compliment you can
give. Follow us on Twitter @ACL_prevention and tweet about it. #ACLPlayItSafe and help us spread the passion.
Dr. Nessler is a practicing physical therapist with over 20 years sports medicine clinical experience and a nationally recognized expert in the area of athletic movement assessment. He is the developer of an athletic biomechanical analysis, is an author of a college textbook on this subject and has performed >5000 athletic movement assessments. He serves as the National Director of Sports Medicine Innovation for Select Medical, is Chairman of Medical Services for the International Obstacle Racing Federation and associate editor of the International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training.
No comments:
Post a Comment